ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis harbouring two
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term effectiveness and safety of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators and their impact on the lives of people with cystic fibrosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Hypokalemic Hypochloremic Metabolic Alkalosis in Cystic Fibrosis: A Retrospective Observational Study with Clinical Characterization,International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Observational
- Targeted Therapy for Restoring CFTR Activity: From Experimental to Clinical Features.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in cystic fibrosis: CFTR modulator triple combinations.The European respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Highly Effective Modulator Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis: Addressing Unusual Variants in the Middle East.Pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The European Medicines Agency has recently expanded the label of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) to all people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) aged 2 years and older who have at least one non-Class I mutation in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator ( Methods: PwCF with two Class I variants who received ETI for an individual 4-6 week trial were identified within the real-world French compassionate programme and their response to ETI, as assessed by a centralized adjudication committee, was evaluated based on evolution of clinical data, lung function and sweat chloride. The lists of Class I Findings: Among 652 participants who were recruited in the French compassionate programme from May 19, 2022, to March 26, 2025, 163 had two Class I variants and received ETI. 155 (95%) were considered as non-responders and stopped ETI, whereas 8 (5%) were considered as responders and continued ETI. The six Class I variants probably responsive to ETI were: E831X and 4374+1G > A (each present in 2 participants), 1716+2T > C, 4382delA, 875+1G > A and CFTRdup1-3 (each present in 1 participant). Using CFTR2 and Interpretation: Class I variants are usually not responsive to ETI and pwCF with two true Class I variants should not be treated with ETI. However, exceptional Class I Funding: Association Vaincre la Mucoviscidose, Société Française de la Mucoviscidose, Filière Maladies Rares MUCO-CFTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.