ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2025
Clinical and Social Functioning Outcomes of Assisted Outpatient Treatment: Results From a Multisite Evaluation.
Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study used data from a multi-site evaluation of six assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) programs to assess the effectiveness of AOT on treatment adherence, clinical functioning, and social functioning outcomes. Methods: Sites provided primary data (e.g., structured client interviews across multiple timepoints) and subsets of secondary data on Medicaid/non-Medicaid service encounters, local/state arrest records, and public/private hospitalizations. One of the six sites provided primary data for a comparison population. Pre-post analyses pooled data across each of the six AOT sites and incorporated robustness checks using comparison and secondary data. Results: Among 392 AOT clients, appointment and treatment adherence increased by more than 24% and 20%, respectively, in 6- and 12-month follow-up windows relative to baseline. Symptomology, perceived mental health ratings, life satisfaction, and therapeutic alliance scores all improved significantly. Violent behavior was reduced by more than 19%, and suicidal ideation decreased by more than 24%. There was more than a 40% reduction in the percentage of clients with any psychiatric inpatient episodes, and more than an 8-night reduction in the number of nights spent in psychiatric inpatient care. The proportion of clients with arrests decreased by more than 19%, those with any illicit drug use decreased by more than 14%, and in the 6 months following entry into AOT, there was a 12% reduction in the proportion of clients experiencing any homelessness. Conclusions: Findings point to significant improvements across a range of client outcomes upon receipt of AOT, spanning domains of treatment adherence, clinical functioning, and social functioning outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.