ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2025
Eleven-Month Arrest Outcomes Among Three Crisis Response Models in Michigan.
Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mobile crisis effectiveness: a systematic review and associated functions and forms framework.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- A Scoping Review of the Peer-Reviewed Research on Alternative First Response for Mental and Behavioral Health Crisis and Homelessness.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Communities of Practice in Emergency Mental Health Care for Involuntary Patients in Common Law Countries: A Scoping Review of Evidence Gaps.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Mobile crisis and co-response models are increasingly popular mental health crisis response alternatives to law enforcement. In theory, crisis response models could increase behavioral health treatment connections and divert people with mental illnesses from jails. This exploratory study compares post-year arrests of individuals who received services from three crisis response models (co-response, mobile crisis, and office-based crisis) against individuals who received law enforcement-only responses in five communities. Methods: Medicaid billing data and clinician service records identified ( Results: Bivariate analyses supported the inclusion of response types in a regression. All three crisis models showed fewer post-year arrests than their respective law enforcement-only comparisons, but only the mobile crisis response predicted a statistically significant reduced incidence rate of arrest (incidence rate ratio 0.548; Conclusions: This study is the first to assess post-year arrest outcomes of mobile crisis teams and adds to the null arrest literature of co-response teams. Mobile crisis teams may divert future crisis service pathways away from 911, decreasing law enforcement involvement and arrest risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.