Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40932732›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2025

Patient-Centered Approach to Assessing Voice Impairment.

Elizabeth G Willard, Thomas L Carroll, Minjee Kim, Ayako Stanlie, Clark A Rosen, Jennifer J Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth G WillardDepartment of Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Thomas L CarrollDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Minjee KimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ayako StanlieIC Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Clark A RosenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco.
Jennifer J ShinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) is an established instrument with clear utility. However, national agencies are emphasizing the importance of patient-centered assessments beyond diagnostic test results. How patients view the VHI-10 and its items is not known. Objective: To understand patients' perceptions of the VHI-10 items and to identify a potential subset of 6 items for use as a shorter patient-centered assessment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective psychometric and patient-centered study conducted at tertiary care and community-based laryngology practices with consecutive adult patients who presented for laryngology evaluation from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2024. Consecutive responses to the VHI-10 questionnaire were evaluated using factor and item response theory (IRT) analyses. Participants ranked VHI-10 items and provided qualitative feedback, which was inductively coded. Participants were asked what is "most important to you and your voice experience" when evaluating 3 proposed shorter subsets of the VHI-10. Exposures: VHI-10 questionnaire and 3 subsets of 6 items each, including item ranking (evaluated by factor analysis and item response theory). Main Outcomes and Measures: Factor analysis and item response theory were used to produce 3 subsets of the VHI-10 for quantitative and qualitative assessment by participants. Results: The analysis included data from 6048 consecutive patients (mean [SD] age, 52.0 [8.4] years; 3326 female [55%] and 2722 male [45%] individuals) with completed VHI-10 questionnaires that were evaluated via factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) assessment. In addition, 461 consecutive patients prioritized the VHI-10 items and 521 rated each of the 3 potential subsets. Factor analysis confirmed unidimensionality and IRT analysis demonstrated that items 4, 3, 6, and 1 had the highest discrimination parameters, while items 6, 7, and 1 were most frequently ranked as most or more important; item 5 was included in all sets because of prior clinician and patient input on its importance. Of the 3 subsets proposed, the patients favored set 1, which was composed of these items from the VH1-10: (1) my voice makes it difficult for people to hear me; (2) people have difficulty understanding me in a noisy room; (3) my voice difficulties restrict personal and social life; (6) I feel as though I have to strain to produce voice; and (7) the clarity of my voice is unpredictable; plus item (5), my voice problem causes me to lose income. Conclusion and Relevance: This psychometric study identified a shorter version of the VHI-10 that may be more patient-centered and clinically sufficient for assessing patients with voice impairments. These findings may form the foundation for additional assessments that are more patient-centered, efficient, and nuanced.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationPatient-Centered CareVoice DisordersAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesVoice Quality

Identifiers

PMID40932732
PMCPMC12426860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.