ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Prediction Model of Intradialytic Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients Based on Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring predictors of low nutritional literacy in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a machine learning and network analysis approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The escalating global burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly end-stage renal disease (ESRD), has intensified reliance on hemodialysis (HD), imposing substantial financial and operational burdens on healthcare systems and patients. Intradialytic hypertension (IDH), a critical complication during HD, is associated with life-threatening cardiovascular and neurological sequelae if unmanaged. This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML)-driven early-alert system for IDH risk prediction by integrating demographic profiles and dialysis session records, enabling clinicians to preemptively identify high-risk patients and prioritize targeted monitoring. Two clinical prediction models (IDH-1 and IDH-2) were developed using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and TabNet algorithms. IDH-1 estimates immediate hypertension risk by analyzing pre-dialysis vital signs and longitudinal treatment patterns, whereas IDH-2 predicts subsequent session risks by synthesizing real-time dialysis parameters with historical biomarkers. Model performance was rigorously validated using standardized metrics, including AUC-ROC, sensitivity, accuracy, and F1 score, to ensure clinical applicability. 185,125 HD sessions as training set and 71,427 sessions as testing set were used in this study. For IDH-1, the LGBM model demonstrated superior discriminative capacity (AUC: 0.87; recall: 0.73; F1 score: 0.36), outperforming SVM and TabNet. Similarly, LGBM achieved the highest performance for IDH-2 (AUC: 0.74; recall: 0.56; F1 score: 0.26). Most significant parameters in IDH-1 Predictor with LGBM were pre-dialysis diastolic pressures, historical mean arterial pressure, and historical average IDH episodes. For the IDH-2 model with LGBM, historical average IDH episodes and post-dialysis systolic pressures were most important parameters. This study provides two kinds of superior discriminative capacity LGBM model for IDH predicting. The proposed models offer a scalable framework for personalized risk stratification, potentially mitigating adverse outcomes in hemodialysis populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40932673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.