Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40932654›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026

Towards a Less Ideal Theory About Well-being-The Case of Post COVID Condition.

Erik Gustavsson, Ericka Johnson, Richard Levi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erik GustavssonDivision of Philosophy and Applied Ethics, Department of Culture and Society, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. erik.gustavsson@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5448-9209
Ericka JohnsonDivision of Gender Studies, Department of Thematic Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Richard LeviDepartment of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet Dnr 2021-01245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post COVID-19 Condition (PCC) is a complex condition presenting significant challenges for patients. Individuals suffering from severe PCC are often assessed in rehabilitation medicine departments or specialized post-COVID centres, where their condition is evaluated using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The ICF framework primarily focuses on functional impairments, disabilities, and restrictions in participation, with an emphasis on the concept of "functioning." However, a critical question remains: how does this notion of functioning relate to the well-being of these individuals? This paper explores this issue by examining three fictionalized but typical case studies of PCC patients in relation to two distinct theoretical approaches. First, we engage with theories about well-being from the philosophy of well-being emphasizing the individual's perspective. Second, we explore relational approaches in bioethics and their theoretical underpinnings, which emphasize how people are situated, considering context and relations rather than purely individual conditions. The paper highlights the potential tensions between these approaches while arguing that a more comprehensive understanding of well-being can emerge by integrating insights from both traditions. Through the examination of PCC patient cases, we propose that well-being can be better understood when approached from multiple angles, enriching the understanding of patient outcomes in rehabilitation medicine.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePsychological Well-BeingSARS-CoV-2Long CovidPost CovidRehabilitation medicineRelational approachesWell-being

Identifiers

PMID40932654
PMCPMC13388766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.