Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40932636›Full record

ReviewDrugs2025

The End of the Line for Modified-Release Opioids in Acute Pain Management: How Did We Get Here?

Pamela Elizabeth Macintyre, Jennifer Anne Stevens, Jane Quinlan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pamela Elizabeth MacintyreDiscipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. pamela.macintyre@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1569-8056
Jennifer Anne StevensBrian Dwyer Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Public Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9837-0031
Jane QuinlanNuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0212-4459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following announcements from professional and governmental bodies across a number of countries, modified-release (MR) opioids are no longer recommended in the routine management of acute pain, and so should not be initiated for this reason. The recommendations are not new, but a recent cluster of publications by key professional and governmental bodies has more clearly challenged their use and highlighted the need for change in guideline-driven and individual practice. The inclusion of MR opioids in many postoperative pain regimens relatively soon after they were first marketed for use in patients with chronic non-cancer pain, was not based on sound evidence, and there remains no evidence of benefit. In contrast, however, good evidence has accumulated that shows they not only provide less effective pain relief compared with immediate-release opioids, but that they lead to a higher risk of adverse effects including opioid-induced ventilatory impairment and persistent opioid use.

Indexed as

Acute PainAnalgesics, OpioidPain ManagementDelayed-Action PreparationsHumansPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidDelayed-Action Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.