Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40932607›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2025

Visual performance fields in saccadic suppression of image displacement.

Rosanne H Timmerman, Antimo Buonocore, Alessio Fracasso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rosanne H TimmermanPsychology, School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland.
Antimo Buonocore *Department of Educational, Psychological and Communication Sciences, Suor Orsola Benincasa University, 80135, Naples, Italy.
Alessio Fracasso *School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland. alessio.fracasso@unipd.it.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S006605/1Fundação Bial A-29315Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca PRIN 2022_PNRR-P2022ST78T
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual perception is not homogeneous throughout the visual field. Performance is generally better along the horizontal meridian compared to the vertical meridian, and in the lower compared to the upper visual field. These asymmetries in visual performance are reflected in structural asymmetries in early visual cortex. When exploring a visual scene, eye movements occur continuously, with visual perception resulting from a tight interplay between the visual as well as the oculomotor systems. Literature on visual performance across visual fields during saccades is limited, but existing studies show that perceptual performance during saccades is indistinguishable between the upper and the lower visual fields, or altogether better in the upper visual field compared to lower. In the current exploratory study, we asked participants to detect the direction of target displacement across visual fields, while performing a saccade as well as at fixation. During fixation and saccade viewing conditions, performance on the task was better along the horizontal compared to the vertical meridian. However, we did not observe a robust difference in performance between the lower and upper visual field, neither at fixation nor when participants were requested to perform saccades. We interpret our results based on known behavioural and neural anisotropies, as well as considering evolutionary approaches to the perception-action cycle.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceSaccadesVisual FieldsVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultAnisotropiesEye movementsPerformance fieldSaccadeSaccadic suppression of image displacementSSID

Identifiers

PMID40932607
PMCPMC12425848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.