Trial reportClinical drug investigation2025
Low-Dose Propranolol versus Amitriptyline for Episodic Migraine Prophylaxis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDirect head-to-head evidence of propranolol and amitriptyline for migraine prophylaxis is limited. This clinical trial compared the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of low-dose propranolol versus amitriptyline for episodic migraine prophylaxis over a 3-month period.
methodsThis randomized, controlled, open-label, prospective, parallel, single-center trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in India. A total of 60 prophylaxis-naïve patients with episodic migraine were randomized 1:1 to receive either low-dose propranolol (80 mg/day) or amitriptyline (10 mg/day). The primary outcome was the improvement in the monthly headache frequency at 3 months from baseline, while the secondary outcomes included improvements from baseline in the proportions of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days, headache severity, headache-induced disability, monthly rescue medication intake, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness (measured by the average cost-effectiveness ratio [ACER] and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER]).
resultsAt 3 months, propranolol showed a significantly greater reduction in monthly headache frequency compared with amitriptyline (- 3.67 ± 1.47 versus - 2.87 ± 1.36 days, P = 0.03). More patients in the propranolol group (60%) achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days compared with the amitriptyline group (43.33%) (P = 0.02). Propranolol also showed a greater reduction in monthly rescue medication intake (P = 0.01), but differences in headache severity, headache-induced disability, and quality of life were not significant. Both groups experienced mild adverse drug reactions. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed propranolol had a higher ACER (US $5.44) and ICER (US $0.40/1% reduction) than amitriptyline.
conclusionsIn our trial, low-dose propranolol demonstrated superior efficacy to amitriptyline in episodic migraine prophylaxis. Both drugs were well tolerated. Our study suggests that amitriptyline was more cost-effective than propranolol. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trial Registry-India (Date: 27 October 2020; registration no.: CTRI/2020/01/022972).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40932597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.