ArticleParasitology research2025
Comparison of the efficacy of local thermotherapy versus Glucantime® in the treatment of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis: a pilot study.
Article in Parasitology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cutaneous and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis: Perspectives on Immunity, Virulence, and Treatment.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This pilot study is the first in Iran that evaluates the effectiveness of thermotherapy compared to intralesional Glucantime® in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania tropica. Forty patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis were separated into two groups, each consisting of 20 patients. The control group received intralesional Glucantime® weekly for 8 weeks, while the other group received a single session of thermotherapy for each lesion using ThermoMedTM model 1.8. The patients were monitored for 6 months, during which the outcomes were evaluated by considering the dimensions, consistency, and rates of remission of the lesions. The terms "initial remission" and "complete remission" were clearly defined, and any instances of therapy failure were documented. The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 24.0, employing independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and ANOVA. Both treatment groups exhibited considerable decreases in lesion size and enhanced texture, with no statistically significant differences. Nevertheless, the group that underwent thermotherapy demonstrated a more significant decrease in lesion size and improvement in texture after 6 months. The remission rates were similar; however, Glucantime® achieved a faster remission. No significant side effects were recorded in either group. The present study showed that thermotherapy was equally effective as intralesional Glucantime® in treating anthroponotic leishmaniasis. Thermotherapy can be considered as an alternative, especially when Glucantime® cannot be used, even though it requires further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.