Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40932551›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2025

Effect of Dual-task Standing on prefrontal-motor Cortex Activation and postural-related Muscle Activity between Young and Older Adults.

Jiahao Pan, Shuqi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiahao PanSchool of Physical Education, Jimei University, Xiamen, China.
Shuqi ZhangDepartment of Kinesiology & Biomechanical Engineering Doctoral Program, Boise State University, Boise, USA. shuqizhang@boisestate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of dual-task standing on postural-related muscle activity and cortical activation in both young and older groups. Fourteen older adults and thirteen young adults were recruited. Participants performed single-task and dual-task standing. The surface electromyographic signals of tibialis anterior, solus, rectus femoris, and biceps femoris at left and right sides were recorded. Simultaneously, cortical activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal and motor cortices were measured. Two-way MANOVAs with repeated measures and Pearson correlation analyses were employed for the statistical analysis. Our results indicated that only the older group presented greater right (p = .002) and left (p = .003) ankle muscle co-activation index, and greater cortical activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (p < .001), premotor motor cortex (p = .011), supplementary motor area (p = .043), and primary motor cortex (p = .028) in the left hemisphere during dual-task compared to single-task standing. Additionally, the older group showed negative correlations, whereas the young group showed positive correlations between cortical activation and average linear envelope of muscle activity during the single-task standing. Furthermore, the older group showed more significant positive correlations between cortical activation and average linear envelope of muscle activity than the young group during dual-task standing. These observations suggest that age-related overactivation of the prefrontal-motor cortex may lead to redundant ankle joint muscle response during dual-task standing.

Indexed as

AgingMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalPostural BalancePosturePrefrontal CortexStanding PositionAdultAgedElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultAgingMuscle responseNeural processingPostural automaticity

Identifiers

PMID40932551
PMCPMC12426098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.