Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40932536›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Research priorities to address supportive care needs in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)-results from a Delphi survey.

Catriona Parker, Robert Weinkove, Andrew H Wei, Zoe K McQuilten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Feasibility and preliminary effects of mhealth supportive care interventions in adults with myeloid neoplasms: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catriona ParkerTransfusion Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. catriona.parker@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6500-3075
Robert WeinkoveCancer Immunotherapy Programme, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Andrew H WeiPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Zoe K McQuiltenTransfusion Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA cute myeloid leukaemia (AML) carries major clinical, economic, and psychosocial burdens. Supportive care is critical to prevent mortality and morbidity and support long-term well-being. Many AML trials focus on treating AML disease, but few prospectively evaluate supportive care measures. This study sought to identify AML supportive care research priorities to inform the design of future AML clinical trials.

methodsA three-stage online Delphi process was used. Participants (clinicians and people with lived experience) were invited from Australia and New Zealand through the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG), the Leukaemia Foundation, and professional networks. Round 1 generated supportive care research question, and in round 2, participants rated each question's importance. A priori criteria were applied for a question to continue to round three. Finally, participants ranked their top 10 research questions and the type of research needed to address each question.

resultsA total of 31 participants completed round one, and 22 in rounds two and three. People with lived experience made up 32% of the sample in round one, 45% in round two, and 27% in round three. Round one resulted in 66 research questions across 13 domains. In round two, from the initial 66 questions, 16 (24%) met the criteria to progress to the next round. In the final round, participants agreed on 10 priority research questions.

conclusionThis Delphi process identified ten supportive care research priorities in AML across many domains, including infection management, bleeding prevention, nutrition, exercise, and frailty assessments. This work, which incorporates people with lived experience, can be used to inform design of future AML trials.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdultAgedAustraliaDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandResearchAcute myeloid leukaemiaPrioritisationSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID40932536
PMCPMC12426066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.