ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Impact of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on micro-shear bond strength to dentin.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Photodynamic therapy for caries management: mechanisms, applications, and perspectives.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate in vitro the bond strength through the micro-shear test of two adhesive systems (self-etching and total-etch), on bovine dentin surfaces after aPDT. For the aPDT, 0.01% methylene blue and two different light sources (red laser and LED) were used.Sixty samples were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 10) for the micro-shear test: G1: self-etching adhesive (USB) without aPDT, G2: aPDT (laser) + USB, G3: aPDT (LED) + USB; G4: total-etch adhesive (ASB) without aPDT; G5: aPDT (laser) + ASB, G6: aPDT (LED) + ASB), followed by analysis of the fracture patterns of the samples. For statistical analysis, a two-way ANOVA (adhesive and treatment) and Tukey's test were performed, adopting a significance level of 5%.Regarding bond strength, there was no significant difference between the 6 groups analyzed. An adhesive fracture pattern predominated.Based on the results and the irradiation parameters used in this study, no changes in the bond strength of the resin to healthy dentin were observed after treatment with aPDT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40932505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.