ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Effects of psychostimulants on locomotor activity in the BTBR T
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationalePeople with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often have psychiatric comorbidities, with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) being the most common. Psychostimulants used as ADHD treatments are less effective in these dual diagnosis individuals, with lower rates of symptom improvement and a higher incidence of adverse drug effects. The mutant BTBR T
objectivesWe determined dose-effect curves for locomotor effects of 10 different psychostimulants in adult male BTBR and C57Bl/6 N (C57) mice, including amphetamine and other monoamine releasers, methylphenidate and other reuptake inhibitors, as well as some drugs with a mixed profile of monoamine release and reuptake inhibition.
methodsMice were surgically implanted with radiotelemetry probes which measured locomotor activity within the home cage.
resultsA robust strain difference was typically observed at large doses, wherein C57 mice entered motor stereotypy while BTBRs did not. This resistance to stereotypy in BTBR mice resulted in dramatically increased locomotor stimulant effects across drugs.
conclusionsBecause resistance to locomotor stereotypy in BTBRs was observed among psychostimulants with distinct mechanisms of action and selectivities for monoamine transporters, it is likely that pervasive neurobiological and/or metabolic differences in BTBR mice mediate this effect. Further studies to determine the mechanisms underlying the exaggerated locomotor responses to psychostimulants in BTBR mice are needed. Results of these studies may guide drug development efforts toward identifying more effective and better-tolerated medications for comorbid ASD with ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40932492What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.