ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing for detection of HPV genotypes and sublineages in cervical liquid-based cytology SurePath samples from the Danish screening program.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lactylation-based machine algorithm combined with multi-omics analysis to predict prognosis in cervical cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing for detection of HPV genotypes and sublineages in cervical liquid-based cytology SurePath samples from the Danish screening program.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The carcinogenicity of HPV genotypes is well established. However, HPV genotypes have sublineages with individual risk profiles, and these are much less described with respect to carcinogenicity. Research to characterize HPV sublineages by next-generation sequencing (NGS) on screening-derived liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples is limited because of the technical and quality assurance challenging nature of sublineage analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of detecting HPV sublineages from 14 HPV genotypes in SurePath LBC samples from Danish cervical cancer screening. We included 41 HPV plasmids (the Global HPV LabNet DNA Genotyping Proficiency Panel 2023) to quality assure the NGS approach and 120 SurePath LBC samples from the screening program for proof of concept. Our results of the HPV plasmids showed the correct sublineage for all included HPV genotypes except for HPV68b, where the coverage was inadequate for sublineage analysis. The NGS analysis enabled HPV sublineage analysis in 99.1% (112/113) of HPV-positive SurePath LBC samples. Sublineages belonging to the A lineage were most frequent for HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 51, 52, 58, 59, and 68, while B-type sublineages showed the highest frequency in HPV45, 56, and 66. The most diverse sublineage data was obtained for HPV31 with sublineages from the A, B, and C lineages. In conclusion, our method enables the identification of HPV sublineages in SurePath LBC screening samples. This information can be used in future studies to determine the usefulness of HPV sublineage analysis in screening settings for risk stratification and clinical management of HPV-positive women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.