ArticleJournal of vision2025
Chromatic and achromatic contrast sensitivity in the far periphery.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) has been studied extensively; however, most studies have focused on the central region of the visual field. The current study aims to address two gaps in previous measurements: first, it provides a detailed measurement of the CSF for both achromatic and, importantly, chromatic stimuli in the far periphery, up to 90 dva of visual angle. Second, we describe visual sensitivity around the monocular/binocular boundary that is naturally present in the periphery. In the first experiment, the CSF was measured in three different conditions: Stimuli were either Achromatic (L + M), Red-Green (L - M) or Yellow-Violet (S - (L + M)) Gabor patches. Overall, results followed the expected patterns established in the near periphery. However, achromatic sensitivity in the far periphery was mostly underestimated by current models of visual perception, and the decay in sensitivity observed for red-green stimuli slows down in the periphery. The decay of sensitivity for yellow-violet stimuli roughly matches that of achromatic stimuli. For the second experiment, we compared binocular and monocular visual sensitivity at different locations in the visual field. We observed a consistent increase in visual sensitivity for binocular viewing in the central part of the visual field compared to monocular viewing, but this benefit already decreased within the binocular visual field in the periphery. Together, these data provide a detailed description of visual sensitivity in the far periphery. These measurements can help to improve current models of visual sensitivity and can be vital for applications in full-field visual displays in virtual and augmented reality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.