ArticleJASA express letters2025
Can speech foundation models effectively identify languages in low-resource multilingual aging populations?
Article in JASA express letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deconstructing bilingualism and its sociocultural determinants in cognitive aging and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speech foundation models (SFMs) achieve state-of-the-art results in many tasks, but their performance on elderly, multilingual speech remains underexplored. In this work, we investigate SFMs' ability to analyze multilingual speech from older adults using spoken language identification as a proxy task. We propose three key qualities for foundation models to serve multilingual aging populations: robustness to input duration, invariance to speaker demographics, and few-shot transferability in low-resource settings. Zero-shot evaluation indicates a noticeable performance drop for shorter inputs. We find that native speakers' speech consistently outperforms non-native speech across languages. Few-shot learning indicates better transferability in larger models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.