ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2025
A Machine Learning-Based Model to Estimate the Risk of Pulmonary Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Machine Learning-Based Model to Estimate the Risk of Pulmonary Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Critical Appraisal of "A Machine Learning-Based Model to Estimate the Risk of Pulmonary Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients".Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- A Machine Learning-Based Model to Estimate the Risk of Pulmonary Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with high mortality. Early detection and proper management may improve outcomes in high-risk patients. This study aimed to develop a simple and effective model for screening PH risk in this population. We retrospectively screened 1082 CKD patients. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, univariate and multivariate logistic regression (LR). Nomograms were developed for PH risk assessment. The discriminative ability was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and the accuracy was assessed with a Brier score. Models were validated externally by calculating their performance on a validation cohort. Eight machine learning models were developed, and their performance was evaluated. Decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve were used to assess the model's clinical usefulness. A total of 440 patients were included in the analysis, with 308 in the development cohort and 132 in the validation cohort. The final nomogram included five variables as follows: haemoglobin, gamma-glutamyl transferase, triglycerides, coronary heart disease and NT-proBNP. The AUROC of the model was 0.772 (95% CI: 0.731-0.806). External validation confirmed the model's good performance, with an AUROC of 0.782 (95% CI: 0.696-0.854). Among the eight machine learning models, LR showed the best performance. We developed a machine learning model based on clinical and biochemical features to assess PH risk in CKD patients. It enables early detection and risk stratification during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.