Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40932176›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

It's About Time-Breathing Dynamics Modulate Emotion and Cognition.

Josh Goheen, Yasir Çatal, Imola MacPhee, Tyler Call, Cameron Carson, Reem Ali, Rabeaa Khan, Kareen Weche, John A E Anderson, Georg Northoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Josh GoheenDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1745-8785
Yasir ÇatalThe Royal and the University of Ottawa's Institute of Mental Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Imola MacPheeDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Tyler CallDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Cameron CarsonDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Reem AliDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rabeaa KhanDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kareen WecheDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
John A E AndersonDepartment of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Georg NorthoffThe Royal and the University of Ottawa's Institute of Mental Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canada Research Chair CRC-2020-00174Canada-UK Artificial Intelligence (AI) Initiative ES/T01279X/1European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Program 785907Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada DGECR-2022-00309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breathing rate, phase, and amplitude have been shown to track changes in emotional states such as anxiety and cognitive performance in tasks that involve perception, attention, and short-term memory. It is common practice to characterize breathing by using a block average breathing rate, phase, or amplitude. While these features are useful for measuring the central tendencies of breathing, they do not capture the structure of the patterns of change in its activity over time (i.e., breathing dynamics) whose relationship with affective and cognitive processes remains unclear. To fill this knowledge gap, we characterized breathing dynamics by a set of measures that capture the breathing signal's rate and amplitude central tendency, variability, complexity, entropy, and timescales. Then, we conducted a principal components analysis and demonstrated that these metrics capture similar, yet distinct features of the breathing rate and amplitude time series. Next, we showed that breathing dynamics change across rest and task conditions, suggesting they may be sensitive to changes in behavioral states. Finally, using multivariate analyses, we demonstrated that breathing complexity and entropy in the resting state are strongly and positively correlated with anxiety levels, while breathing variability in the task state is strongly and negatively associated with working memory performance. Our findings extend the current understanding of how breathing is associated with affective and cognitive processes by highlighting the key role of dynamics in that relationship.

Indexed as

AnxietyCognitionEmotionsMemory, Short-TermPsychomotor PerformanceRespirationRespiratory RateAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultanxietybreathingcognitiondynamicsneurovisceral integration model

Identifiers

PMID40932176
PMCPMC12424284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.