ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Yield on Reinterpretation of Genetic Variants in Pediatric Cardiomyopathy.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene-specific reclassification patterns of variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Knowledge graph visualization and retrospective analysis of genetic research on pediatric cardiomyopathy (2000-2024).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVariant interpretation can change over time as new knowledge emerges. Our aim was to determine the frequency and causes of variant reinterpretation on systematic reevaluation in pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy.
methodsOverall, 227 unrelated pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy enrolled in the Heart Centre Biobank harbored a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant or a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) on clinical genetic testing (2005-2022). Variant pathogenicity was reevaluated using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Additional extension cohorts (n=4547, cases) were analyzed to assess variant burden in cases versus controls (gnomAD 4.1.0).
resultsA total of 382 variants (110 P/LP, 272 VUS) in 227 patients were reevaluated. Forty-nine variants in 49 patients (21.6%) changed classification. Twelve (10.9%) P/LP variants were downgraded to VUS in 14 patients. Leading criteria were high population allele frequency and variant not located in mutational hotspot or critical functional gene domain. Thirty-seven (13.6%) VUS were upgraded to P/LP in 35 patients. Leading criteria were variant location in mutational hotspot for gene and deleteriousness on in silico prediction. Only 8 reclassified variants had been reported back by the clinical genetic testing laboratory at the time of the study. Ten of the 37 VUS upgraded to P/LP were significantly enriched in cardiomyopathy cases (n=4796) versus controls.
conclusionsOne in 5 patients with cardiomyopathy had a clinically relevant change in variant pathogenicity on systematic reevaluation that would require modifying family clinical screening and cascade genetic testing. These findings underscore the clinical importance of regular variant reinterpretation on follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.