ArticleNoise & health
Occupational Noise Exposure and Self-Reported Hearing Loss amongst Workers in Primary Coffee Processing Factories in Ethiopia.
Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbout 15 million people are directly and indirectly involved in Ethiopian coffee production. Coffee workers in Ethiopia may be exposed to workplace noise due to industrial machines, but the extent of their exposure and the prevalence of hearing loss are currently unknown.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate noise exposure, identify factory and task-related conditions that significantly increase noise levels and assess self-reported hearing loss amongst coffee workers in Ethiopia.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 primary coffee processing factories in three Ethiopia regions. A total of 60 machine room workers were involved in full-shift, personal noise exposure measurements. The results from an observational checklist and statistical analysis of noise measurement data were used to identify the determinants of personal noise exposure. Additionally, 130 randomly selected workers participated in interviews on self-reported hearing loss, yielding a 100% response rate.
resultsThe average daily noise exposure amongst machine room workers was 96.3 decibels A-weighted (dBA). Ninety-two per cent of the measurements exceeded the occupational exposure limits of 85 dBA, and 40% exceeded 90 dBA. The presence of more than one huller machine was associated with a 4.5 dBA increase in noise exposure. Approximately, 53% of the machine room workers reported at least one symptom of hearing loss. Workers with more than 10 years of experience had nearly three times higher risk of hearing loss symptoms than those with less than 5 years of experience, after adjusting for age and other factors (adjusted prevalence ratio = 2.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-5.9).
conclusionsThese findings highlight the significant health risk of noise exposure faced by workers in primary coffee factories, with over half of these workers reporting symptoms of hearing loss, and most of them being exposed to noise levels above the recommended limit value. Implementing interventions to reduce noise levels amongst coffee workers is essential to protect their hearing well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.