ArticleNoise & health
Application of Ward Noise Management in Patients with Laryngeal Cancer after Laryngectomy: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluated the effect of a comprehensive noise management strategy on postlaryngectomy recovery by focusing on noise levels, sleep quality, psychological status, and complications.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 100 patients with laryngeal cancer who had undergone laryngectomy at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University between February 2023 and November 2024. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the time of their admission. The routine nursing group (47 patients, prerenovation phase, February-November 2023) received standard postoperative care, and the noise management group (53 patients, postrenovation phase, February-November 2024) received comprehensive noise management. The key indicators assessed were ward noise levels, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) value, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, and postoperative complications.
resultsThe noise management group had significantly lower daytime and nighttime noise levels compared with the routine nursing group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores did not differ significantly between the groups before or after nursing (P > 0.05). The PSQI and total scores and the HADS anxiety and depression scores in the noise management group were significantly lower than those in the routine nursing group (P < 0.05). The postoperative complications in the noise management group amounted to 7.55% versus the 10.64% in the routine group, with no significant difference (P > 0.05).
conclusionNoise management positively affects postlaryngectomy recovery by improving sleep quality and reducing psychological distress. These findings emphasize the importance of noise control in postoperative care and suggest that noise control strategies should be incorporated into routine care protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.