Review in Journal of integrative plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Rida ArshadState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6628-6979
Tayyaba RazzaqState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6535-6571
Bilal AhmadState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9902-9994
Ting HouState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4325-5567
Chaochao LiState key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology & Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7536-0527
Zhongxin JinState key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology & Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-7140
Wei ZhangState key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology & Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0014-9182
Zhongjie LiuState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8406-6709
Hui-Run HuangKey Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Plant Conservation and Utilization in Southern China, South China Botanical Garden, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-5627
Peitao LüState key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology & Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4894-6458
Wei WangState key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology & Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1436-1395
Xue-Jun GeKey Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Plant Conservation and Utilization in Southern China, South China Botanical Garden, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5008-9475
Yongfeng ZhouState Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0780-2973
Jianghui XieState key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology & Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5298-3107
Funding
Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences CATASCXTD202309National Natural Science Foundation of China U22A20487the China Agriculture Research System CARS-31the project of the National Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding NKLTCB202306the Science Fund Program for Distinguished Young Scholars of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Overseas) to Yongfeng Zhou
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Bananas and plantains of the genus Musa constitute the most vital fruits and staple foods. Cultivated bananas may have originated from intraspecific and interspecific hybridizations of four wild species, namely Musa acuminata (A), M. balbisiana (B), M. schizocarpa (S), and the Australimusa species (T). Here, we appraise the advances made in banana genomics, genetics, and breeding over the past few decades. The sequencing of Musa genomes has been a major breakthrough in banana research programs, presenting unprecedented possibilities for gaining deeper insights into the evolution, domestication, breeding, and genetics of indispensable agronomic traits of bananas. Also, we delve into how these genetic facets, coupled with innovative genomic-assisted tools, including genomic selection and gene editing, propel advancements in banana breeding endeavors. Ultimately, we propose the forthcoming prospects within the domain of banana genetics and breeding.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Banana breeding by genome design. · full record | OpenQuestion