Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40932008›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025

Eliminating the high-risk CTV1 margin in DAHANCA oropharyngeal radiotherapy: Dosimetric impact on dysphagia and organ-at-risk doses.

Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders S Bertelsen, Irene Hazell, Sarah W Stougaard, Jørgen Johansen, Jens Overgaard, Jesper Grau Eriksen, Ruta Zukauskaite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian Rønn HansenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Christian.Roenn@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-5716-6069
Anders S BertelsenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0022-0786
Irene HazellLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Sarah W StougaardLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2654-5469
Jørgen JohansenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3911-3929
Jens OvergaardDepartment of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0814-8179
Jesper Grau EriksenDepartment of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1145-6033
Ruta ZukauskaiteLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0915-6880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRadiotherapy for head and neck cancer must balance tumour control with late toxicities such as dysphagia and xerostomia. Recent retrospective studies suggest that the margin from the gross tumour volume (GTV) to the high-dose clinical target volume (CTV1) may not be critical for local control, while larger irradiated volumes increase the risk of toxicity. The study quantifies potential reductions in dose to organs at risk (OARs) and predicted dysphagia risk when the standard 5 mm GTV-to-CTV1 margin is eliminated in oropharyngeal cancer. Patient/material and methods: Retrospectively 30 oropharyngeal cancer patients treated consecutively during 2023 according to the DAHANCA guidelines (5 mm GTV-to-CTV1 margin) were selected. For each patient, a standard plan and a modified experimental plan (CTV1 = GTV, and CTV2 reduced by 5 mm accordingly) were generated using Pinnacle3 Auto-Planning. All plans met the DAHANCA target coverage and OAR dose constraints. Dose-volume data for relevant OARs were extracted and compared in MATLAB. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for dysphagia was applied.

resultsMargin elimination reduced high-dose CTV volumes by 70%, yielding significant dose reductions to multiple OARs. Mean doses to the upper/middle pharyngeal constrictors decreased by around 4-5 Gy (p < 0.001) and to the contralateral submandibular gland by ~5 Gy (p < 0.001). These dosimetric gains correspond to an estimated median ΔNTCP of 6.0% of late grade ≥ 2 dysphagia. Target coverage and conformity were maintained in all plans.

interpretationOmitting the high-risk CTV margin can substantially reduce the dose to dysphagia--associated OAR without compromising target coverage. This approach shows promise for improving patient-reported swallowing outcomes and warrants clinical evaluation.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersOrgans at RiskOropharyngeal NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40932008
PMCPMC12439217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.