ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025
Postpartum hemorrhage: Findings of a global survey by the World Association of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology (WATOG).
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Approach to Postpartum Hemorrhage: Early Diagnosis and Evidence-Based Therapeutic Management.Cureus · 2026Review
- Postpartum hemorrhage: Findings of a global survey by the World Association of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology (WATOG).International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
- Prevalence, emerging aetiologies, and contemporary predictors of primary postpartum haemorrhage in a tertiary-level obstetric population in Nnewi, Nigeria: a pilot study.Kronika (Ljubljana, Slovenia) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains the leading cause of maternal mortality globally. This global survey was conducted to identify any disparities in the causes, prevalence, treatment, and mortality burden of PPH, with the aim of proposing relevant recommendations to bridge these disparities and ultimately reduce the global maternal mortality and morbidity burden of PPH. A cross-sectional survey of maternity care providers worldwide was conducted by the World Association of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology (WATOG) in collaboration with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Childbirth and PPH Committee. The study instrument was a 15-item structured electronic questionnaire, designed using Google Forms®. The questionnaire included multiple choice and short answer questions on the baseline characteristics of respondents, causes, prevalence, treatment modalities, and mortality from PPH. The questionnaire was electronically distributed via WATOG and FIGO social media channels to study participants. In total, 339 responses were received from 64 countries in six regions, including Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, South America, and Oceania. The majority (n = 182, 53.7%) of respondents reported seeing an average of at least 10 cases of PPH in their hospitals each month. More respondents in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Africa and Asia reported seeing more than 10 PPH cases monthly, compared to those in high-income countries in Europe and America (57.1% vs. 49.2%, P < 0.001). Most (n = 318, 93.8%) respondents volunteered that their hospitals recorded less than five PPH-related maternal mortalities monthly. All (n = 8, 2.4%) respondents who reported more than five PPH-related maternal mortalities were based in LMICs in Africa. Only 133 (39.2%) respondents reported availability of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG) in their hospitals. Of those who reported non-availability of the NASG, 60% were in LMICs. The most common treatment for intractable PPH were uterine compression sutures (n = 177, 52.2%) and hysterectomy (n = 128, 37.8%). Less than 1 in 10 (n = 30, 8.8%) reported availability of vascular ligation and embolization procedures. PPH remains a significant obstetric complication globally, with a higher morbidity and mortality burden in LMICs. There is an urgent need for concerted global efforts to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality from PPH, especially in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.