ReviewJournal of cutaneous medicine and surgery
Patient-Centered Outcomes in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Management: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most prevalent type of cancer worldwide, with a significantly rising incidence. While postoperative patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) are key metrics in cancer care, they are understudied with regard to NMSC care. This review aimed to summarize the existing data investigating the QoL outcomes after treatment of NMSC and the determinants of patient satisfaction in NMSC management. PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to December 1, 2023. Twenty eligible studies were identified, with 7 examining patient satisfaction, 12 examining QoL, and 1 looking at both. The studies used various tools, with the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire being the most common for assessing patient satisfaction, and the Skin Cancer Index for QoL. Many factors (some controllable, others non-controllable) were found to influence postoperative patient satisfaction, such as preoperative QoL and interpersonal manners of the providers. QoL outcomes were often but not always linked with patient satisfaction and influenced by several factors, such as age, pretreatment mental health, and tumor localization. Clinicians should consider patient perspectives when determining the effectiveness of interventions for NMSC patients. Understanding the factors that influence patient satisfaction and QoL is crucial in delivering comprehensive patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.