Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931949›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2026

Observer Dreams: Criteria and Frequency.

Darren M Lipnicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The frequency of observer dreams in Parkinson's disease patients and relation with clinical variables.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Observer Dreams: Criteria and Frequency.Journal of sleep research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Darren M LipnickiCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1684-3577

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous theories of dreaming consider embodied self-representation and participation in dream events as key features. However, past studies suggest that the dream self is absent or an uninvolved observer in over 10% of adult REM dreams. Further, these dreams can be similarly elaborate and of comparable narrative structure to participatory dreams. The current study presents new criteria for observer dreams informed and illustrated by reports from adult dream series. Three types of observer status are described: (I) no embodied self-representation, (II) an essentially disembodied self that sees events from within the dream environment, and (III) an embodied self that observes events virtually, often on TV. All types require observation of events or an activity with dynamic flow. The new criteria are used to determine observer dream frequencies in the dream reports from Hall and Van de Castle's 1963-1964 University of Miami study. The overall percentage of observer dreams in the Miami reports was 13.1%, and Type I was the most frequent (8.0% of all reports). Past studies show that observer dreams are more frequent in children and older adults than in young adults. An exploratory investigation of age differences in the current study was consistent with this, suggesting a rise in observer dreams from young adulthood. Additionally, direct physical aggression was found in around 20% of observer dreams, with potential implications for the threat simulation hypothesis of dream function. This study's findings suggest that observer dreams warrant greater consideration, including integration into theories of dreaming.

Indexed as

DreamsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ConceptSleep, REMYoung Adultdream seriesembodiedobserver dreamparticipationself

Identifiers

PMID40931949
PMCPMC13193353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.