Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931838›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025

Guidance on Establishing Health Monitoring Panels for Laboratory Mice to Reflect Contemporary Pathogen Prevalence.

Wai H Hanson, Brianne M Hibl, Christopher A Manuel, Christina Pettan-Brewer, Lise Phaneuf, Kerith R Luchins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enhancing Rodent Welfare, Cost Savings, and Efficiency: Implementation and Review of Data-Driven Improvements.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Review
  2. The Use of Ampicillin-Medicated Diet to Treat Segmented Filamentous Bacteria in a Mouse (Mus musculus) Colony.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  3. Rodent Pathogen Detection via Testing of Soiled Nesting Material.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wai H HansonDivision of Animal Resources, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Brianne M HiblOffice of Comparative Medicine, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Christopher A ManuelOffice of Laboratory Animal Resources, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Christina Pettan-BrewerDepartment of Comparative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Lise PhaneufAnimal Resources & Compliance, The Centre for Phenogenomics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and.
Kerith R LuchinsAnimal Resources Center and Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DCM, direct colony samplingEDIM, epizootic diarrhea of infant miceEDT, exhaust duct testingHM, health monitoringLCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virusLDV, Lactate dehydrogenase elevating virusMAV, mouse adenovirusMCMV, mouse cytomegalovirusMHV, mouse hepatitis virusMNV, murine norovirusMPV, mouse parvovirusMTLV, mouse thymic virusMVM, minute virus of micePVM, pneumonia virus of miceRCHPV-1, Rodent chaphamaparvovirusSBS, soiled bedding sentinelSFB, Segmented filamentous bacteriaSFSB, sentinel-free soiled beddingTMEV, Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus

Identifiers

PMID40931838
PMCPMC12189336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.