Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931829›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

Coordinating the Medical Division of Labour: The Travails of Electronic Patient Records in the United Kingdom and United States.

Clare Herrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Clare HerrickDepartment of Geography, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5402-4639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the interrelations between medical specialisation, the changing division of medical labour and the technologies that have emerged to coordinate and integrate patient care. Drawing on the examples of the United Kingdom and the United States, countries whose health systems provide important points of commonality and distinction, I explore the intersections between the rise of medical specialisation and the creation of new medical and paramedical roles. These roles have often emerged as a palliative to the increasing fragmentation and atomisation of medical labour, to 'assist' overburdened clinicians and provide better coordinated and integrated patient care. However, as they have proliferated, these new roles have challenged the very nature of work itself. Technology has long held promise as a means of integrating the workforce, service provision and care in ways that might enhance the patient experience and outcomes. Turning to the example of the electronic patient record as one such coordination technology, I explore the travails of its implementation with respect to the healthcare workforce trends and patient care. In so doing, I aim to further contribute to recent scholarship on healthcare workforce trends, role proliferation, 'taskification' and strategies to manage the negative externalities of these on patient care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsHumansUnited KingdomUnited Statescoordinationdivision of labourintegrationpatient recordsprofessionsspecialisationtechnologyworkforce

Identifiers

PMID40931829
PMCPMC12423903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.