ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2025
In-Flight Deterioration Occurs Early in Aeromedical Trauma Patients.
Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intercontinental aeromedical transfers after decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: Systematic review and evidence-informed fitness-to-fly pathway.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- In-Flight Deterioration Occurs Early in Aeromedical Trauma Patients.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliably defining the risk of adverse in-flight events in aeromedical trauma patients could enable more informed pre-departure treatment and guide central asset allocation to achieve better system-level outcomes. Unfortunately, the current literature base specifically examining the in-flight period is sparse. Flight duration is often considered a proxy for the risk of in-flight deterioration; however, there is limited data to support this commonly held assumption. This paper examines the association between flight duration and the risk of in-flight deterioration in aeromedical trauma patients. A total of 2927 cases of aeromedical transport for acute trauma were retrospectively examined, and the time to first hypotension was recorded. Cases were categorised as either primary or inter-hospital transfer retrievals. Cases were also subclassified as being a primary Traumatic Brain Injury or not based on several criteria, including initial GCS. The median time to hypotension was 11.5 min overall, 10 min in primary retrieval cases, and 15 min in inter-hospital transfer cases (p = 0.049). Notably, after approximately 50 min, a significant plateau in cumulative risk was observed. Isolated TBI cases had a significantly higher overall rate of in-flight hypotension, at 39.5% compared to 9.2%. Overall, this paper supports the physiologically plausible assumption that longer aeromedical transfer times are associated with an increased risk of deterioration during flight. It also demonstrates that deterioration tends to occur early in flight, raising questions as to why this might occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.