ArticleF1000Research2025
An updated Bioconductor workflow for correlation profiling subcellular proteomics.
Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The spatial proteome of the Plasmodium falciparum schizont illuminates the composition and evolutionary trajectories of its organelles.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A lipoprotein partner for theeLife · 2026Article
- Dynamic subcellular proteomics identifies regulators of adipocyte insulin action.Nature communications · 2026Article
- An updated Bioconductor workflow for correlation profiling subcellular proteomics.F1000Research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Subcellular localisation is a determining factor of protein function. Mass spectrometry-based correlation profiling experiments facilitate the classification of protein subcellular localisation on a proteome-wide scale. In turn, static localisations can be compared across conditions to identify differential protein localisation events. Methods: Here, we provide a workflow for the processing and analysis of subcellular proteomics data derived from mass spectrometry-based correlation profiling experiments. This workflow utilises open-source R software packages from the Bioconductor project and provides extensive discussion of the key processing steps required to achieve high confidence protein localisation classifications and differential localisation predictions. The workflow is applicable to any correlation profiling data and supplementary code is provided to help users adapt the workflow to DDA and DIA data processed with different database softwares. Results: The workflow is divided into three sections. First we outline data processing using the QFeatures infrastructure to generate high quality protein correlation profiles. Next, protein subcellular localisation classification is carried out using machine learning. Finally, prediction of differential localisation events is covered for dynamic correlation profiling experiments. Conclusions: A comprehensive start-to-end workflow for correlation profiling subcellular proteomics experiments is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.