Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931744›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2025

Occupational Therapists' perspectives of implementing a new rehabilitation intervention for visual field loss due to stroke.

Christine Hazelton, Sam Harding, Jayne Angilley, Alexandra Palombi, Audrey Bowen, Phil Clatworthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine HazeltonGlasgow Caledonian University School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Sam HardingResearch and Development, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-2094
Jayne AngilleyNHS Cornwall & Isles of Scilly, Truro, UK.
Alexandra PalombiRoyal Holloway University of London School of Life Sciences and the Environment, Egham, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9230-093X
Audrey BowenThe University of Manchester Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Manchester, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-1215
Phil ClatworthyDepartment of Neurology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators of implementing rehabilitation interventions for visual field loss due to stroke. Methods: The study was a qualitative exploration using one-to-one interviews coded using template analysis and the COM-B a-priori framework. Participants were five occupational therapists from hospital (n=4) and community (n=1) National Health Service (NHS) stroke care settings in England. The intervention experienced by the participant was a standardized goal-based visual scanning and search training for stroke survivors with visual field loss, delivered by occupational therapists (OTs), supported by information sheets and a dedicated website (HABIT). Results: HABIT provides a structured approach for delivering scanning and visual search training. HABIT resources aided participants' understanding and self-management. HABIT was considered similar to current practice as practiced by study participants and of most value to trainees and newly qualified therapists. However, resources had limited accessibility due to a lack of computer access and difficulty in reading text; modifications were required to make training activity examples more suitable for ward settings. Within ward settings, the delivery of HABIT was highly limited by time constraints; therapists ranked activities linked to safety and early discharge as higher priority. Clinicians noted that stroke survivors' lack of awareness of their visual loss and its impact limited their engagement with the HABIT, making delivery difficult. Conclusion: Prioritization of vision rehabilitation in highly pressurized acute settings is a key factor in implementing HABIT. The findings will enable further refinement of HABIT content and delivery to address the barriers identified and improve its suitability in acute hospital settings.

Indexed as

feasibilityhemianopiainterviewsqualitativerehabilitationscanning trainingStrokevision

Identifiers

PMID40931744
PMCPMC12417978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.