Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931708›Full record

ReviewPeriodontology 20002025

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence-powered cancer prediction from oral microbiome.

Negin Soghli, Aminollah Khormali, Darius Mahboubi, Aimin Peng, Patricia A Miguez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Periodontology 2000, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Negin SoghliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Adams School of Dentistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Aminollah KhormaliAdams School of Dentistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Darius MahboubiAdams School of Dentistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Aimin PengDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Adams School of Dentistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2452-1949
Patricia A MiguezLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1255-3887

Funding

The novel role of microtubule regulators in the DNA damage responseR01CA233037 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Aimin Peng · 2021 to 2026
$1.8M
Greatwall in replication stress/DNA damage responses and oral cancer resistanceR01DE030427 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PENG, AIMIN · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
Targeting the stress-specific function of replication protein A in oral squamous cell carcinomaR21DE034524 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Channabasavaiah Gurumurthy, Aimin Peng · 2025 to 2026
$438k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233037NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE030427NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE034524NIH HHS CA233037NIH HHS DE030427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral cancer is a major global health burden, ranking sixth in prevalence, with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) being the most common type. Importantly, OSCC is often diagnosed at late stages, underscoring the need for innovative methods for early detection. The oral microbiome, an active microbial community within the oral cavity, holds promise as a biomarker for the prediction and progression of cancer. Emerging computational techniques in the artificial intelligence (AI) field have enabled the analysis of complex microbiome data sets to unravel the association between oral microbiome composition and oral cancer. This review provides a comprehensive overview of learning-based algorithms applied to oral microbiome data for cancer prediction. In particular, this work discusses how typical machine learning (ML) algorithms, such as logistic regression, random forests, and artificial neural networks, identify the unique microbial patterns associated with oral cancer and other malignancies. A search was conducted in Pubmed covering a 10-year period. The goal was to identify previous studies focused on the role of the oral microbiome in oral cancer prediction using AI-powered tools. The search strategy identified 3382 records in total, of which 44 studies met the inclusion criteria. While AI has shown a transformative power in understanding and revealing the oral microbiome's role in cancer studies, its application in clinical settings requires further efforts on standardization of protocols, curation of diverse cohorts, and validation through large-scale multi-centric and longitudinal studies. The integration of AI with oral microbiome analysis holds significant promise for improving early detection, risk stratification, and personalized treatment strategies for OSCC. By identifying unique microbial patterns associated with cancer, AI-driven models offer a noninvasive, cost-effective tool to predict disease progression and guide clinical decision-making. However, translating these advancements into routine clinical practice requires standardized protocols, diverse patient cohorts, and validation through large-scale, longitudinal studies. Once implemented, this approach could transform oral cancer management, enabling timely interventions and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCarcinoma, Squamous CellMicrobiotaMouthMouth NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computercancer predictionKeywordsartificial inteligencemachine learningoral microbiomeperiodontitis

Identifiers

PMID40931708
PMCPMC12842876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.