ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Individualized Frequency-Dependent Stimulation to the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus May Improve Antiepileptic Effects in Patients With Focal Epilepsy.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Individualized Frequency-Dependent Stimulation to the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus May Improve Antiepileptic Effects in Patients With Focal Epilepsy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimA total of 30% of individuals with epilepsy are resistant to drug treatment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) shows promise for treating drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), but further research is needed to optimize DBS parameters, including stimulation frequency. This study aimed to reveal the optimal frequency for ANT-DBS by testing the real-time effects of various stimulation frequencies on the ANT among patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation.
methodsEleven patients (8 males; mean age, 24.2 years; mean epilepsy duration, 13.5 years) were enrolled. Postoperative electrode reconstruction identified ANT contacts for bipolar stimulation between 10 Hz and 100 Hz at 10-Hz increments, with a 1-min interval between stimuli. The effects were analyzed on the basis of spike count, power spectral density, and causal flow.
resultsOur study revealed that ANT stimulation suppresses seizure focus activity and modulates brain network dynamics, with the effects varying by individual characteristics and frequency. Stimulation at 10-70 Hz reduced spikes (> 50%) and PSD (p < 0.05) in the epileptogenic region while also influencing network connectivity between the epileptogenic zone and adjacent cortical regions, including the frontal, temporal, and insular lobes, as well as the overall brain network.
conclusionsInstead of using a fixed high frequency for ANT-DBS, the optimal frequency should be selected for each patient. Patients who do not respond well to high-frequency ANT-DBS can use a lower frequency, such as 10-70 Hz.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.