ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2026
Democratizing Organ-On-Chip Technologies With a Modular, Reusable, and Perfusion-Ready Microphysiological System.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A microphysiologic human cervical model recapitulates microbial, immune, and pathogenic properties of sexually transmitted infections.Science advances · 2026Article
- Modular parallel plate flow chamber with tunable substrate mechanics and defined shear stress.Biomedical microdevices · 2026Article
- Modular Parallel Plate Flow Chamber with Tunable Substrate Mechanics and Defined Shear Stress.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Organ-on-chip (OOC) technologies, also called microphysiological systems (MPS), offer dynamic microenvironments that improve upon static culture systems, yet widespread adoption has been hindered by fabrication complexity, reliance on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), and limited modularity. Here, a modular MPS platform is presented, designed for ease of use, reproducibility, and broad applicability. The system comprises layered elastomeric inserts for dual monolayer cell culture, which is clamped within a reusable acrylic cassette for perfusion studies. This enables researchers to decouple model establishment from flow experiments and streamline their workflows. The system is validated using dual epithelial and endothelial cell co-culture under static and perfused conditions, including shear-induced alignment of HUVECs. Material testing confirmed biocompatibility, while vinyl cutting reproducibility demonstrated high manufacturing fidelity. The platform reliably supported long-term culture (up to 14 days), and the open insert format facilitated uniform seeding and imaging access. This approach enables parallelized experimentation, minimizes pump usage, and is well-suited for labs without microfabrication infrastructure. By combining fabrication flexibility with biological robustness, this work establishes a generalizable platform for modular tissue-chip development adapted to diverse organ systems and serves as a foundational framework for democratizing advanced in vitro model systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.