Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931509›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2025

A New Wave of Ultrasound Phantoms Using Real Fixed Organs: Birth of the Danny Phantom.

John M Fender, Amy M Habing, Layla K Behbahani, Sean H McCready

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A New Wave of Ultrasound Phantoms Using Real Fixed Organs: Birth of the Danny Phantom.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John M FenderCollege of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8545-2772
Amy M HabingDiagnostic Imaging Department, Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7855-9718
Layla K BehbahaniCollege of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4475-6124
Sean H McCreadyDepartment of Teaching and Learning, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5069-0668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasonography in veterinary medicine serves a vital role in the diagnosis and management of various medical conditions by allowing noninvasive visualization of internal structures. Veterinary students face many challenges in gaining hands-on experience with ultrasound equipment and developing competencies in ultrasonography. This is largely due to the limited access and ethical dilemmas of live animal models and the high cost of commercial phantoms. To solve these issues, the niche of cost-effective amateur models has exponentially increased. However, while these at-home models solve the financial issues associated with commercial phantoms, they still lack the realism and fidelity necessary to simulate the real-time feedback needed to gain the spatial awareness of this dynamic imaging modality. To foster successful day-one-ready veterinary students, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine acknowledged that a better solution should be possible. A prospective anatomic study was performed to recognize the imaging anatomy and usability of a new model termed the Danny Phantom. This model was developed by testing various amateur phantom materials from both the literature and self-discovered. These materials were analyzed and deemed satisfactory versus unsatisfactory based on fulfillment of predetermined criteria of an ideal phantom model. It was determined that real fixed organs can be encased in traditional bovine gelatin to produce an ultrasound phantom with recognizable parenchyma. Other additives can be included to give the phantom an imitated peritoneal space and prevent spoilage of the gelatin for an extended period of time.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingAnimalsCattleModels, AnatomicUltrasonographyamateur phantomcadaver organsclinical skillsEMAgelatin

Identifiers

PMID40931509
PMCPMC12423588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.