Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931486›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Use of Muscle Relaxants in Emergency Medicine: A Review.

Paweł Radkowski, Maciej Szewczyk, Mariusz Grażewicz, Kamil Sobolewski, Dariusz Onichimowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Narrative Review of the Role of Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in Anesthesia: Perspective 2026.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paweł RadkowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9437-9458
Maciej SzewczykDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology, Diabetology, Geriatrics, and Clinical Immunology with the Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinical Hospital No. 1 in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0009-0818-4848
Mariusz GrażewiczDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine Clinical, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7912-8426
Kamil SobolewskiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3404-2108
Dariusz OnichimowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7648-7511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern anesthesia, intensive care, and emergency medicine rely heavily on neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), first introduced in 1942. These agents not only facilitate endotracheal intubation but also improve surgical conditions by suppressing muscle responses to stimuli. NMBAs function via depolarizing (eg, succinylcholine) or non-depolarizing mechanisms. Non-depolarizing agents are further classified by chemical structure into aminosteroids (eg, rocuronium, vecuronium), benzylisoquinolinium compounds (eg, atracurium, cisatracurium), and asymmetric mixed-onium chlorofumarates (gantacurium). These differ in metabolism, histamine release potential, and duration of action. The effect of neuromuscular blocking agents is influenced by numerous patient-related factors, including age, body weight, sex, organ function, and others, which significantly complicates the selection of the optimal drug and its dose. In emergency medicine, NMBAs are critical for rapid-sequence intubation (RSI), used in both prehospital and emergency department (ED) settings. RSI is performed under challenging conditions, often involving critically ill patients with unknown medical histories. Succinylcholine and rocuronium are the primary agents used in this context. Ongoing debates persist regarding the choice between succinylcholine and rocuronium for RSI, the potential superiority of one agent over the other, and the selection of the optimal dosage. Modern technologies allow for neuromuscular blockade monitoring through train-of-four (TOF) assessment. However, such monitoring methods are rarely used in ED. This review article explores the pharmacological characteristics, clinical indications, and emergency applications of NMBAs, emphasizing the need for increased awareness of their risks and proper use.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency MedicineNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsNeuromuscular MonitoringHumansRapid Sequence Induction and IntubationRocuroniumSuccinylcholineNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsRocuroniumSuccinylcholine

Identifiers

PMID40931486
PMCPMC12439509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.