ArticleInternational journal of cosmetic science2026
New alternatives in photoprotection: Preparation and evaluation of lamellar silicate derivatives and their use as sunscreens.
Article in International journal of cosmetic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interfacial Engineering of Clay-Based Nanohybrids with pH-Responsive Network-like Behavior for Hair Photoprotection and Algal Growth Promotion.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- New alternatives in photoprotection: Preparation and evaluation of lamellar silicate derivatives and their use as sunscreens.International journal of cosmetic science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this work is to investigate different sunscreens and Viscogel group organoclays for the preparation of new intercalated sunscreens to improve the effectiveness and safety in photoprotection using new approach methodology (NAMs).
methodsFor this study, we examined Diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate (DHHB), octyl methoxycinnamate (OMC), Bemotrizinol (BEMT) and Viscogel S4®, S7®, and B8® using a set of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strains that are sensitive to UVA, UVB and Solar Simulated Light (SSL) to evaluate their photoprotective and mutagenic potential. Additionally, we developed delaminated nanocomposites by chemical intercalation reactions followed by ultrasonic treatment to enhance clay exfoliation. These nanocomposites were then characterized using X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) and Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS).
resultsAs a function of photoprotective action and safety, the combination of Viscogel S4® and OMC filter was chosen for nanocomposite development. Our results evidenced the intercalation of the OMC in the organoclay (S4 + OMC-NC). Survival and mutagenesis tests indicated a positive effect of the formulation, as it increased cell survival to SSL, even without reducing mutagenesis, while its respective physical mixture was unable to provide antimutagenic protection.
conclusionS4 + OMC-NC showed promising results for photoprotection, offering cellular protection combined with antimutagenic effects upon SSL exposure. This formulation enables prospects for the preparation of new, effective and safe photoprotective formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.