ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2025
Reconsidering Electrocardiographic Predictors of Culprit Coronary Artery Occlusion in NSTEMI Patients.
Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reconsidering Electrocardiographic Predictors of Culprit Coronary Artery Occlusion in NSTEMI Patients.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This letter provides a critical appraisal of the study by Wei et al. on clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of left circumflex artery occlusion in NSTEMI patients. While the authors identified STV5 + STV6 ≥ 2.5 mm and T-wave imbalance as potential markers, concerns remain regarding the single-center, retrospective design, limited sensitivity of ECG findings, and the lack of significant differences in clinical outcomes. Prior meta-analyses suggest a higher risk in patients with occluded culprit arteries, highlighting inconsistencies with the present study. Future research should employ multicenter prospective designs and advanced diagnostic modalities, including posterior ECG leads and artificial intelligence-based analysis, to improve detection and risk stratification of culprit LCX occlusion in NSTEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.