ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Accelerated motion-robust abdominal 3D T1ρ mapping using diamond radial sampling.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acceleration of Phase-Modulated Ultrashort Echo Time Sequence for Fast TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and validate a fast, motion-robust, free-breathing abdominal 3D T1ρ mapping method by combining variable-density diamond radial k-space sampling with fast-MAPSS (magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned-k-space spoiled gradient-echo snapshots).
methods3D MAPSS T1ρ imaging was performed at 3T using five spin-lock time (TSL) pairs in phantom scans and three TSL pairs in nine healthy volunteers. Phantom experiments compared Cartesian sampling (reference) with stack-of-stars and diamond radial sampling. Volunteer scans utilized stack-of-stars and diamond sampling. T1ρ values were calculated using mono-exponential fitting with MAPSS (five or three TSL pairs) and fast-MAPSS (three TSLs). These values were compared across sampling methods and T1ρ techniques in phantom and in vivo for the liver, pancreas, and muscles.
resultsDiamond sampling achieved a 2.2-fold acceleration compared to stack-of-stars. In phantom experiments, mean T1ρ differences from reference Cartesian MAPSS were -1.93% for stack-of-stars, and -0.09% for diamond sampling. Fast-MAPSS with three TSLs resulted in differences of 0.54% (stack-of-stars) and 1.45% (diamond). In volunteers, a strong correlation (R
conclusionFast-MAPSS with diamond radial k-space sampling enables clinically feasible, motion-robust, free-breathing 3D T1ρ mapping of the abdomen with reduced scan time and quantification accuracy comparable to standard methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.