Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931356›Full record

ReviewOne health outlook2025

A scoping review of the national strategy for brucellosis control in Egypt: logic framework, challenges, and prospects.

Ekram W Abd El-Wahab

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in One health outlook, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ekram W Abd El-WahabDepartment of Tropical Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, 165 El Horreya Road, Alexandria, 21561, Egypt. ekram.wassim@alexu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4220-5859

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucellosis remains a significant public health and economic challenge in Egypt despite long-standing control efforts. This paper outlines the national strategy for brucellosis control, detailing its legal framework, diagnostic protocols, surveillance mechanisms, vaccination programs, and biosecurity measures. MAIN BODY: Egypt employs a dual approach of test-and-slaughter and selective vaccination, supported by serological and pathological diagnostics. Surveillance combines passive reporting, risk-based monitoring, and active outbreak investigation. While progress has been achieved, particularly in establishing brucellosis-free dairy compartments, eradication remains elusive due to inconsistent compliance, limited animal registration, inadequate compensation, and cultural barriers. Challenges also include insufficient epidemiological data, especially in small ruminants, and weak coordination between veterinary and public health sectors. Global comparisons highlight the importance of ecosystem-based and One Health approaches.

conclusionThis review identifies critical gaps in surveillance, control coverage, and stakeholder engagement. It calls for integrated policy reforms, investment in diagnostic and monitoring infrastructure, enhanced public awareness, and regional cooperation to accelerate Egypt's path toward brucellosis elimination.

Indexed as

BrucellosisControlEgyptLogic framework

Identifiers

PMID40931356
PMCPMC12424204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.