ArticleBMC health services research2025
Bridging the knowledge gap: a mixed-methods study on general practitioners' information needs for mHealth apps in hypertension treatment in Germany.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension remains a critical public health issue in Germany, affecting millions of individuals. Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) offer promising solutions for improving patient outcomes and adherence in hypertension management. Despite their advantages in healthcare, the adoption of mHealth apps by general practitioners (GPs) in Germany remains limited to date.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the needs, attitudes, and recommendation behaviours of GPs regarding mHealth apps in hypertension management.
methodsA mixed-methods approach was utilised, starting with a quantitative questionnaire of 205 GPs in Berlin and Brandenburg to collect representative data on attitudes, information needs, and app recommendation behaviour. Two focus groups (N = 15) provided qualitative insights into the reasons behind observed behaviours and potential solutions for addressing information gaps.
resultsOf the 205 participating GPs, 41.5% currently recommend mHealth apps, while 77.6% expressed a willingness to recommend them in the future. Positive attitudes toward mHealth apps were widespread, with 37.6% viewing their integration into hypertension management positively and 43.4% somewhat positively. Furthermore, 54.1% rated the usefulness of mHealth apps as high or very high, and 35.1% provided similar ratings for user-friendliness. However, 59.1% reported feeling poorly or not informed at all about mHealth apps for hypertension management. Positive attitudes significantly increased the likelihood of recommending mHealth apps (G = 0.955, p < 0.001), as did higher ratings for usefulness (G = 0.887, p < 0.001) and user-friendliness (G = 0.625, p < 0.001). Notably, a high need for information about app functionalities (G = 0.617, p < 0.001) and available app offerings (G = 0.710, p < 0.001) was strongly associated with willingness to recommend apps. The focus groups highlighted gaps in systematic information dissemination and practical integration of mHealth apps, with participants calling for targeted educational resources and improved technical support.
conclusionWhile GPs in Berlin and Brandenburg are generally willing to integrate mHealth apps into hypertension management, information gaps remain. Providing tailored educational resources and fostering collaboration among stakeholders could improve the uptake and effective use of mHealth apps in practice. Further investigation is needed to understand the relationship between knowledge levels and recommendation behaviours.
trial registrationIdentifier DRKS00029761 , Registration Date: 27.07.2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.