Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931340›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Development and content validation of an instrument to assess the prevalence of psychiatric medication use among dental students at Brazilian universities.

Aléxia Caroline Leandro da Conceição, João Victor Frazão Câmara, Ana Flávia Almeida Barbosa, Ane Poly, Gisele Damiana da Silveira Pereira

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aléxia Caroline Leandro da ConceiçãoSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
João Victor Frazão CâmaraClinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Saarland University, Homburg Saar, Germany. jvfrazao92@hotmail.com.
Ana Flávia Almeida BarbosaSchool of Dentistry, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ane PolyCollege of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Gisele Damiana da Silveira PereiraSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a measurement instrument aimed at assessing the prevalence of psychiatric medication use among final-year dental students enrolled in Brazilian universities. Methods: The process emphasized both the construction of the questionnaire and the collection of evidence for its content validity. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The initial stages involved defining the main research problem, establishing the instrument’s objectives, determining its conceptual domains, identifying the target population, and constructing the items, scoring system, and response scales. Based on a comprehensive literature review, a preliminary questionnaire consisting of 23 open- and closed-ended items was created. This version was submitted to a panel of eight expert judges—academics and/or researchers specializing in Psychology, Psychiatry, Pedagogy, and Dentistry/Instrument Development—tasked with evaluating each item’s clarity. Results: Content analysis was conducted using consensus thresholds. Quantitatively, the agreement rate among judges was calculated as the proportion of experts endorsing each item. Items with less than 90% agreement were revised; items with 90% or greater agreement were considered acceptable. In the first round of evaluation, 14 items were rejected. After modification based on judge feedback, all items were approved in the second round. The high level of agreement among experts was deemed sufficient to provide evidence of content validity. Following expert validation, a pre-test was conducted with dental students’ representative of the target population. Based on both qualitative and quantitative feedback, two questions were adjusted, leading to the development of the final version of the instrument. Conclusions: These initial findings and methodological steps form the foundation for the instrument’s definitive application in future research assessing psychiatric medication use among undergraduate dental students.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychotropic DrugsStudents, DentalBrazilEducation, DentalFemaleHumansPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesPsychotropic DrugsAnxietyDental studentsMental disordersSurveys and questionnairesValidation study

Identifiers

PMID40931340
PMCPMC12421737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.