ArticleBMC nursing2025
Professional experiences with journal club implementation in postgraduate nursing: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostgraduate education is embracing journal clubs (JCs), which provide a platform for members to critically evaluate research articles and extract evidence-based nursing practice. The implementation of JCs by postgraduate nurses, especially in varied educational contexts such as Egypt, remains underexplored. This study aimed to explore and gain valuable insights into the professional experiences of implementing JCs among postgraduate nursing students in Egypt.
methodsA qualitative study utilizing focus group discussions (FGDs) was conducted with 42 postgraduate nursing students between September and December 2024. The participants were selected through purposive sampling. The inductive thematic analysis revealed several key themes.
resultsThe study identified five main themes: familiarity with JCs, benefits of JCs, preparation and implementation, challenges, and recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of JCs. This study highlights the significance of JCs in promoting evidence-based nursing competencies, cultivating a research-oriented culture, and enhancing clinical application. Participants expressed concerns regarding time constraints and insufficient training, highlighting areas for improvement. It suggests integrating JCs into curriculum, aligning professional and academic responsibilities, and offering foundational research methodology training.
conclusionsThe findings show that JCs are viewed by participants as worthwhile learning experiences that foster research literacy, academic development, and transferable skills including critical thinking, communication, and partnership. To enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of curriculum-integrated JCs, several strategies could be implemented: providing faculty training and introductory workshops in research appraisal; intentionally incorporating JCs into the nursing curriculum; allowing participants' clinical and academic obligations; utilizing virtual platforms; and ensuring fair access to research materials. These observations, when combined, support the pedagogical worth of JCs as organized, practice-based learning resources that connect clinical education and research. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.