Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931314›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2025

Cardiovascular Safety of COVID-19 Treatments: A Disproportionality Analysis of Adverse Event Reports from the WHO VigiBase.

Hoi K Cheng, Angel Lai, Maxwell Kwok, Bryan P Yan, Ellen Ngar-Yun Poon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hoi K ChengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0409-5930
Angel LaiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5262-661X
Maxwell KwokSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-9341
Bryan P YanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China. bryan.yan@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0430-5752
Ellen Ngar-Yun PoonSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China. ellen.poon@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-3681

Funding

Health and Medical Research Fund 22210062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe high mortality of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) highlights the need for safe and effective antiviral treatment. Small molecular antivirals (remdesivir, molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) and immunomodulators (baricitinib, tocilizumab) have been developed or repurposed to suppress viral replication and ameliorate cytokine storms, respectively. Despite U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, serious cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) may not be apparent in initial trials.

methodsA retrospective analysis of CVAEs linked to five World Health Organization (WHO) recommended COVID-19 therapies was conducted using the WHO VigiBase database from March 2020 to July 2023. Adjusted reporting odds ratios (aROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess CVAE risks.

resultsA total of 276,631 AEs were reported to be associated with COVID-19, of which 13,091 were classified as cardiovascular events. Remdesivir was associated with significantly increased odds of CVAEs, particularly bradycardia (aROR 2.4, 95% CI 2.28-2.52). In contrast, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir showed reduced CVAEs odds. Among immunomodulators, baricitinib was associated with increased CVAEs risk (aROR 2.31, 95% CI 2.07-2.59), with deep vein thrombosis being the most prominent (aROR 45.34, 95% CI 34.89-58.9), accounting for 38.8% of reported study cases in the database. Also, CVAEs odds were higher during the Omicron period compared to pre-Omicron period.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of continued pharmacovigilance and suggest potential CV safety differences among COVID-19 immunomodulators. Since tocilizumab and baricitinib are similarly indicated for severe patients with COVID-19, further clinical trials are warranted to explore whether tocilizumab represents a safer alternative to baricitinib for these patients. Insights from this study may guide future antiviral repurposing and pandemic preparedness strategies.

Indexed as

AntiviralBaricitinibCardiovascular adverse eventsCardiovascular safetyCOVID-19Deep vein thrombosisImmunomodulatorPharmacovigilanceVigibase

Identifiers

PMID40931314
PMCPMC12480238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.