ArticleGeroScience2026
Phenotypic age acceleration as a novel predictor of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective cohort study.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the predictive value of combined phenotypic age and phenotypic age acceleration (PhenoAgeAccel) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and develop a machine learning-based risk prediction model to inform precision prevention and clinical management strategies. The study analyzed data from 784 male participants in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2001-2008). Phenotypic age was derived from chronological age and nine serum biomarkers. PhenoAgeAccel, representing biological aging acceleration, was calculated as the residual from regressing phenotypic age on chronological age. Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) identified 34 BPH-associated features, which were integrated into an XGBoost prediction model. Logistic regression evaluated PhenoAgeAccel-BPH associations, while SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) quantified feature contributions to enhance model interpretability. The XGBoost model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.833 in the test set. Phenotypic age was strongly correlated with chronological age (r = 0.833), and individuals with PhenoAgeAccel exhibited a significantly elevated risk of BPH (p < 0.001). Adjusting the model with phenotypic age improved predictive performance (AUC = 0.853). SHAP analysis identified phenotypic age as the third most influential predictor (after trailing cancer history and lead exposure), highlighting its clinical relevance. Chronological age and serum biomarkers are critical predictors of BPH, while PhenoAgeAccel independently contributes to risk stratification. Integrating phenotypic age with machine learning provides a robust framework for the early detection of BPH and personalized risk assessment, aligning with advancements in aging biomarker research. This approach supports targeted interventions to mitigate BPH progression in aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.