Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931270›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

From semantic knowledge to semantic features: French semantic feature production norms for 360 concepts.

Widad Rachdi, Stéphanie Mathey, Christelle Robert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Widad RachdiLaboratoire de Psychologie, Université de Bordeaux, LabPsy UR 4139, 3 Place de la Victoire, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France. widad.rachdi@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7036-646X
Stéphanie MatheyLaboratoire de Psychologie, Université de Bordeaux, LabPsy UR 4139, 3 Place de la Victoire, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Christelle RobertLaboratoire de Psychologie, Université de Bordeaux, LabPsy UR 4139, 3 Place de la Victoire, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France.

Funding

Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche 2022-NM-91
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a new set of semantic feature production norms, collected from 580 young adults, for 360 French concepts across various semantic categories. Although empirically derived feature norms have been developed for several languages and have been shown to be useful for investigating semantic memory and providing assessment tools, none are currently available for native French-speaking populations. In this study, the participants performed a property generation task in which they were asked to list features to describe the characteristics of each given concept (e.g., for apple: <is a fruit>, <can be red>, <has seeds>). After having conducted a unification procedure of the participants' productions, we included a total of 4586 semantic features in the norms. We then computed various semantic indexes, ranging from semantic richness variables (e.g., number of features, semantic neighborhood density) to feature informativeness variables (e.g., relevance, cue validity, distinctiveness). In the end, the present semantic feature production norms are organized into four different openly available datasets, each describing a set of semantic measures: (1) concept-feature measures, (2) concept measures, (3) concept-concept matrix, and (4) feature-feature matrix. These semantic feature norms for French concepts should be a valuable tool for researchers interested in investigating normal and impaired semantic cognition.

Indexed as

Concept FormationLanguageSemanticsAdolescentAdultFemaleFranceHumansMalePsycholinguisticsYoung AdultFeature generationSemantic feature normsSemantic memoryYoung adults

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.