Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Physician-led versus questionnaire-based psychosocial screening in adults with high-grade glioma: a cluster-randomized controlled trial (GLIOPT).
Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07409584 (Mental Health and Suicidality in Glioblastoma Patients in Germany - a Multicenter Observational Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mental Health and Suicidality in Glioblastoma Patients in Germany - a Multicenter Observational Study (SHINE-GLIO Study)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental health and suicidality in glioblastoma patients in germany - a multicenter cross-sectional observational study protocol (SHINE-GLIO Study).Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatients diagnosed with high-grade gliomas (HGG) often experience substantial psychosocial dis-tress. However, due to neurological and neurocognitive deficits its assessment remains challenging, and needs remain unmet. We compared a novel face-to-face assessment during doctor-patient conversations with questionnaire-based screening.
methodsIn this multicenter, two-arm cluster-randomized study involving 13 centers patients in the interven-tion group (IG) were screened for distress via physician-patient conversations, while the control group (CG) completed the Distress Thermometer. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with poor emotional functioning (measured with the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire) who received specialized psychosocial care (PC) within 3 months. Data were collected via patient and physician reports and medical records. Analysis employed mixed models logistic regression.
resultsIn total, 763 patients were enrolled at baseline, and 506 completed the follow-up. The emotional functioning was poor in 302/506 (59.7%). The frequency of patients reporting PC utilization was comparable between groups (IG 93/168, 55.4% vs. CG 87/134, 64.9%, odds ratio (OR) =0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.40-1.11, p=0.115). Likewise, the provision of information about special-ized psycho-oncological care was similar (IG 112/168, 66.7% vs. CG 94/134, 70.1%, OR=0.95, 95%CI=0.39-2.29, p=0.904).
conclusionPhysician-led, face-to-face distress screening was not superior to questionnaire-based screening in facilitating psychosocial care referrals. Nonetheless, it represents a feasible and patient-centered alternative, particularly for patients with high-grade gliomas suffering from neurocognitive or func-tional deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.