ArticleOral radiology2026
Evaluation of deep learning-based segmentation models for carotid artery calcification detection in panoramic radiographs.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted segmentation methods in detecting carotid artery calcification (CAC) in panoramic radiographs and to compare the performance of different YOLO models: YOLOv5x-seg, YOLOv8x-seg, and YOLOv11x-seg. Additionally, the study aims to investigate the association between patient gender and the presence of CAC, as part of a broader epidemiological analysis.
methodsIn this study, 30,883 panoramic radiographs were scanned. Annotations were made on 652 radiographs exhibiting features consistent with CAC, totaling 1,086 annotations. Deep learning-based analysis was conducted using three distinct YOLO segmentation models. The performance of these models was assessed using metrics such as precision, accuracy, and F1 score.
resultsThe YOLOv5x-seg model exhibited a balanced performance with a precision, sensitivity, and F1 score of 84.62% each. The YOLOv8x-seg model demonstrated higher sensitivity at 88.46%, albeit with a slightly higher false positive rate, evidenced by a precision of 78.63%. The YOLOv11x-seg model achieved the highest precision at 93.41%, an F1 score of 87.18%, and a sensitivity of 81.73%.
conclusionsAI-based segmentation models utilizing YOLO algorithms can be considered reliable tools for detecting CAC in panoramic radiographs. These models display promising performance appropriate for clinical applications; however, further research with larger and more diverse datasets is required to verify their generalizability and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40931257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.