Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40931256›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

Effectiveness of the SHARE Approach for Improving Clinician Shared Decision Making Skills: A Trial in 12 Practices Located in Colorado, USA.

Laura D Scherer, Daniel Matlock, Christopher Knoepke, Robyn Wearner, Allyson Gottsman, Douglas Fernald, W Perry Dickinson, L Miriam Dickinson, Monica McNulty, Mark Gritz

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura D SchererUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Laura.scherer@cuanschutz.edu.
Daniel MatlockUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Christopher KnoepkeUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Robyn WearnerUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Allyson GottsmanUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Douglas FernaldUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
W Perry DickinsonUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
L Miriam DickinsonUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Monica McNultyUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Mark GritzUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N Revere Ct, Third Floor, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS 75P00120F37005AHRQ HHS Contract# HHSP233201500025I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SHARE Approach Model and training curriculum was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to teach clinicians practicing in diverse settings how to engage in more effective Shared Decision Making (SDM).

objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of the SHARE Approach at improving SDM in practices located across Colorado, USA.

designA longitudinal study with pre- and post-intervention observations.

participantsPrimary care and cardiology practices were recruited from across Colorado. All practice staff were invited to participate in the SHARE Approach training. Patients and providers from these practices participated in SDM assessments.

interventionThe 4-h SHARE Approach training was led by a practice facilitator and consisted of didactic lectures, demonstration videos, group discussion, and group activities. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome measures included (1) evaluation of the training and confidence/understanding in doing SDM using a survey questionnaire of practice staff, (2) patient and clinician-reported SDM occurring in clinical encounters, and (3) SDM captured in audio recordings of a subset of clinical encounters. SDM was hypothesized to improve at post-intervention and maintain gains at follow-up. KEY

resultsTen primary care and two cardiology practices enrolled in the study, located across major regions of Colorado (e.g., Western slope; Eastern plains; front range) and representing diverse practice types (e.g., independent; health system; federally qualified health center). Trainee confidence and understanding of SDM and confidence in ability to engage in SDM improved at post-test and maintained gains at follow-up. Patient- and clinician-reported SDM occurring in clinical encounters did not improve significantly at post-intervention or follow-up. SDM observed on audio recordings did improve at the 6-month follow-up observation.

conclusionsThis study reports the largest and most comprehensive evaluation of AHRQ's SHARE Approach training curriculum. The training was positively received by clinicians and may improve SDM behaviors in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDecision Making, SharedPatient ParticipationAdultColoradoFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID40931256
PMCPMC12686249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.